obÌåÓý

media release (17-428MR)

obÌåÓý reports on corporate insolvencies 2016â€�17

Published

obÌåÓý today published its annual overview of corporate insolvencies based on statutory reports lodged by external administrators for the 2016â€�17 financial year.

Report 558ÌýInsolvency statistics: External administratorsâ€� reports (July 2016 to June 2017) (REP 558) provides information on the nature of corporate insolvencies, supplementing the monthly statistics that obÌåÓý publishes on its website.

An external administrator's role includes investigating company failure and reporting both to creditors and obÌåÓý.

obÌåÓý uses external administrator reports in its work, including in reporting to the market on corporate insolvency.

Key points

  • There was a material decline in reports received during the 2016â€�17 financial year (down 17.9%) reflecting the overall downward trend (down 18.4%) in external administration appointments for 2016â€�17
  • Small to medium size corporate insolvencies dominate external administratorsâ€� reports. Of note, 84% had assets of $100,000 or less; 79% had fewer than 20 employees; and 43 per cent had liabilities of $250,000 or less.
  • 96% of creditors in this group received between 0â€�11 cents in the dollar, reflecting the asset/liability profile of small to medium size corporate insolvencies.
  • obÌåÓý requests supplementary reports from practitioners
    (819 in 2016â€�17) where a report meets certain thresholds (seeÌýAnnexure 2).
  • Over the last three years on average fewer than 20% of supplementary reports received resulted in obÌåÓý taking further action, generally due to the lack of sufficient evidence or because obÌåÓý considered no further action was required.
  • Practitioners advised that they had either commenced or were contemplating initiating recovery actions for insolvent trading for 1,516 reports, compared to 4,878 reports alleging a civil breach for insolvent training.

Annexure 1:Ìý Reporting of alleged insolvent trading

Following are key points concerning alleged insolvent trading based on external administrator reports:

Table 1: Overview of insolvent trading allegations

ÌýÌý

Alleged insolvent trading

ÌýÌý

Civil breach

ÌýÌý

Criminal breach

NoÌýof reports alleging insolvent trading

4,878 reports (62.8%)

1,117Ìýreports (1.5%)

NoÌýof reports alleging insolvent trading that had evidence to support allegation

3,909Ìýout of 4,878 reports (80.1%)

85Ìýout of 117 reports (72.6%)

EstimatedÌýdebts incurred after date of insolvency of less than $1million

3,105Ìýout of 3,909 reports (79.4%)

59Ìýout of 85 reports (69.4%)

EstimatedÌýdebts incurred after date of insolvency of more than $5 million

74Ìýout of 3,909 reports (1.9%)

4Ìýout of 85 reports (4.7%)

TopÌý three indicators â€� grounds for director to suspect insolvency

Non-payment of statutory debts (PAYGW, SGC and Ìý GST) (3,002 reports, or 76.8%)

Difficulties paying debts when they fell due (eg. evidenced by letters of demand, recovery proceedings, increasing age of Ìý accounts payable (1,942 reports, or 49.7%).

Financial statements that disclose a history ofÌýserious shortage of working capital, unprofitable trading (1,843 reports, orÌý47.1%)

Non-payment of statutory debts (PAYGW, SGC and Ìý GST) (54 reports, or 63.5%)

Difficulties paying debts when they fell dueÌý(e.g. evidenced by letters of demand, recovery proceedings, increasing age of Ìý accounts payable (39 reports, or 45.9%).

Financial statements that disclose a history ofÌýserious shortage of working capital, unprofitable trading (38 reports, orÌý44.7%)

AnnexureÌý2: Allegations of misconduct

REP 558 details how often external administrators report alleged misconduct by company officers and the types of alleged misconduct most frequently reported. In the 2016�17 financial year, external administrators reported alleged misconduct for 6,558 reports out of the 7,765 lodged, or 84.5%.

Our next step (prior to requesting a supplementary report from external administrators or initiating an investigation) is to assess the report of misconduct based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

  • the nature of the possible misconduct reported
  • the amount of liabilities
  • the deficiency suffered
  • the availability of evidence
  • prior misconduct, and
  • the external administrator's advice as to whether the reported possible misconduct warrants further investigation.

After assessing the reports, obÌåÓý asked external administrators to prepare 819 supplementary reports where external administrators alleged company officer misconduct. This amounted to 12.5% of all reports that alleged misconduct lodged in the financial year.

Supplementary reports are typically detailed, free-format reports, that set out the results of the external administrator's inquiries and the evidence they have to support alleged offences. Generally, obÌåÓý can determine whether to commence a formal investigation on the basis of a supplementary report. While only a portion of the offences reported may result in a formal investigation or surveillance, obÌåÓý uses the information for broader intelligence and targeting purposes.

Over the last three financial years, after assessment, obÌåÓý referred on average between 17-19% of these cases for investigation or surveillance (see table 2 for a breakdown of outcomes).

Table 2: Supplementary reports by outcome

Outcome

2016-17

2015-16

2014-15

Un-actionable

Ìý Ìý Ìý

No offence

1%

1%

<0.5%

Analysed/assessed for no further action by obÌåÓý

Ìý Ìý Ìý

Requested further report

14%

15%

17%

Insufficient evidence

32%

41%

43%

No action

35%

24%

23%

Referred for action by obÌåÓý

Ìý Ìý Ìý

Referred for compliance surveillance or enforcement

16%

16%

14%

Assist existing investigation or surveillance

2%

3%

3%

Source: obÌåÓý annual report 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17

obÌåÓý considers a range of factors when deciding to investigate and take enforcement action as detailed in Information Sheet 151 obÌåÓý's approach to enforcement ().

Annexure 3: Profile of insolvent companies

REP 558 includes information about the profile of companies placed into external administration, including:

  • industry types
  • employee numbers
  • causes of company failure
  • estimated number and value of a company’s unsecured creditor debts, and
  • estimated dividends to unsecured creditors.

TableÌý3 summarises key data from the report.

Background

REP 558 is obÌåÓý’s seventh annual report and ninth report since external administratorsâ€� reports could be lodged electronically. Here are links to our last three reports:

  • REP 507 (refer ) â€� Annual Statistics for 2016â€�2017
  • REP 456 (refer ) â€� Annual Statistics for 2014â€�2015
  • REP 412 (refer ) â€� Annual Statistics for 2013â€�2014

Table 3: Summary of key data from REP 558

ÌýÌý

Profile of companies

ÌýÌý

2016-17

ÌýÌý
ÌýÌý

2015-16

ÌýÌý
ÌýÌý

2014-15

No.Ìýof employees affected

79% of reports concerned companies with fewer than 20 employees

79% of reports concerned companies with fewer than 20 employees

79% of reports concerned companies with fewer thanÌý20 employees

IndustriesÌýwith most lodgements

Other (business and personal) servicesÌý (2,230 reports, or 29%)

Construction (1,611 reports, or 21%)

Accommodation and foodÌýservices (884 Ìý reports, or 11%)

Other (business and personal) services (2,889 Ìý reports, or 31%)

Construction (1,964 reports, or 21%)

Accommodation and food services (928 reports, or Ìý 10%)

Other (business and personal) services (2,351 reports, or 28%)

Construction (1,771 reports, or 21%)

Accommodation and food services (870 reports, or Ìý 10%)

AssetsÌýand liabilities

84% of failed companies had estimated assets ofÌý$100,000 or less

43% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less

86% of failed companies had estimated assets ofÌý$100,000 or less

46% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less

85% of failed companies had estimated assets of $100,000 or less

41% of failed companies had estimated liabilities of $250,000 or less

Deficiency

64% of failed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less

65% of failed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less

64% of failed companies had an estimated deficiency of $500,000 or less

TopÌý3 nominated causes of failure

Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (3,626, or Ìý 47% of reports)

Poor strategic management of business (3,542, orÌý46% of reports)

PoorÌýfinancial control including lack of records (2,753, or 35% of reports)

Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (4,318, or Ìý 46% of reports)

Poor strategic management of business (4,315, or 46% of reports)

Poor financial control including lack of records Ìý (3,183, or 34% of reports)

Inadequate cash flow or high cash use (3,647, or Ìý 44% of reports)

Poor strategic management of business (3,518, orÌý42% of reports)

Trading losses (2,836, or 34% of reports)

TopÌý3 alleged possible misconduct

s588G(1)â€�(2) Insolvent trading (4,878, or 63% Ìý ofÌýreports)

s180 Care and diligence Directorsâ€� and officersâ€� Ìý duties (3,818, or 49% of reports)

s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financial Ìý records (3,335, orÌý43% of reports)

s588G(1)â€�(2) Insolvent trading (5,736, or 61% ofÌýreports)

s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financialÌýrecords (3,957, or 42% of reports)

s180 Care and diligence
Directorsâ€� and officersâ€� duties (3,636 or 38% of Ìý reports)

s588G(1)â€�(2) Insolvent trading (4,856, or 58% ofÌýreports)

s286 and 344(1) Obligation to keep financial Ìý records (3,209, or 38% of reports)

s180 Care and diligence
Directorsâ€� and officersâ€� duties (2,739, or 33% ofÌýreports)

DividendsÌýto unsecured creditors

In 96% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar

In 97% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar

In 97% of cases, the dividend estimate was less than 11 cents in the dollar