ob体育 has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against Westpac Banking Corporation for failing to respond to customers鈥� hardship notices within the time required by law.
ob体育 alleges that between 2015 and 2022, a deficiency with Westpac鈥檚 online hardship notice process resulted in 229 Westpac customers not receiving a response to their hardship notice within the required timeframe of 21 days.
All of these customers told Westpac they were experiencing financial hardship. Many of these customers also told Westpac about their difficult circumstances and vulnerabilities, including their inability to work, the impacts of serious medical conditions or their carer responsibilities.
In some cases, customers endured debt collection activities by Westpac while waiting for the bank to respond to their hardship notices.
ob体育 Deputy Chair Sarah Court said, 鈥楽ubmitting a hardship notice, which results in a change to the credit contract, can be a lifeline for people experiencing challenging financial circumstances.
鈥榦b体育 has taken this action to highlight the importance of lenders responding to hardship notices within the required timeframe to reduce harm to their customers. Westpac鈥檚 failures to respond to these notices compounded their customers鈥� difficult financial circumstances.鈥�
ob体育 alleges that between 4 September 2017 and 20 March 2022, Westpac breached the National Credit Code (Code). Under the Code, a lender has 21 days to notify the customer if it does not agree to change the contract or if it requires further information to make its decision.
ob体育 also alleges that Westpac breached the National Credit Act by failing to act efficiently, honestly and fairly when it came to responding to its customers鈥� hardship notices.
ob体育 claims Westpac did not do enough to investigate and rectify the systems issues plaguing its online hardship notification process.
ob体育 is seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and adverse publicity orders against Westpac from the Court.
The date for the first case management hearing is yet to be scheduled.
Download
Background
Under the National Credit Code, customers who are experiencing difficulties meeting their repayment obligations under a credit contract may give a lender notice of their inability to meet their obligations. In many instances, after telling the lender of their inability to meet their repayment obligations, the customer and bank will agree on alternative payment arrangements.
Under s 72(4) of the National Credit Code, where a credit provider does not agree to change a credit contract in response to a customer鈥檚 notice, a credit provider must give the customer a notice advising them of this, the reasons they have not agreed and the consumer鈥檚 right to have any complaint regarding the credit provider鈥檚 decision considered by AFCA.
This is ob体育鈥檚 second action against a credit provider for failure to comply with s 72(4) of the National Credit Code. Action against ClearLoans resulted in a $6 million penalty for financial hardship misconduct (23-037MR).
ob体育鈥檚 Moneysmart website has information for consumers on what to do if you are experiencing . If you're unhappy with either the service received, or with your lender鈥檚 decision, you can . If you have multiple debts, or would like help applying for financial hardship, contact the National Debt Helpline on 1800 007 007 to talk to a for free.
Editor's note 1:
The matter has been listed for a case management hearing on 27 October 2023.
Editor's note 2:
On 24 October 2023, the Court vacated the case management hearing to be held on 27 October 2023 and made timetabling orders for the parties.
On 27 October 2023, ob体育 filed an and an with the Court.
Editor's note 3:
On 26 August 2024, the Court listed the matter for hearing on 27 May 2025.