obÌåÓý has handed down 34 recommendations to superannuation trustees, with its report into death benefit claims handling revealing the devastating impacts that poor industry practices can have on grieving Australians.
obÌåÓý Chair Joe Longo said the report identified a range of issues, including excessive delays, poor customer service, and ineffective claims handling procedures, and called on industry leaders to take ownership of the problems and flex their muscle to fix the failings.
‘This is an important report that looked at 10 trustees, representing a total of 38% of all member benefits in superannuation funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. While some trustees performed better than others, tellingly none of the reviewed trustees monitored or reported on their end-to-end claims handling times or performance.
‘At the heart of this issue is leadership that doesn’t have a grip on the fund’s data, systems and processes � and ultimately it is the customers who suffer for it.
‘This kind of disconnect is unacceptable in any area of corporate Australia, but in the superannuation sector it is particularly serious, because super affects everyone from the boardroom to the living room.�
obÌåÓý Commissioner Simone Constant said obÌåÓý calls on the superannuation industry to immediately review and address death benefit claims handling deficiencies by adopting the list of recommendations outlined in Report 806 Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve.
Ms Constant said the actions for trustees cover a range of focus areas, including:
- better customer service and faster response times
- improved monitoring and reporting on claims handling timeframes
- streamlined processes and procedures
- better guidance and training for staff
- removing barriers for First Nations members and claimants
- clearer communications and more support for members.
obÌåÓý is calling out the superannuation industry after a review into the death benefit claims handling practices of 10 trustees revealed:
- many examples of excessive delays and poor service
- gaps in trustee data and reporting
- some trustees� processes and procedures were unclear and inconsistent
- communication and engagement were often ineffective and insensitive, and
- inadequate support for First Nations claimants and claimants experiencing vulnerability.
While some demonstrated good handling practices and were providing helpful services to claimants, Ms Constant said systemic failures by other trustees exposed grieving Australians to added and unnecessary distress after the death of a loved one.
‘Grieving Australians should not have to suffer further stress because of the failure of superannuation trustees to approach claims in a timely, clear, and respectful manner,� she said.
‘Trustees have not put in place meaningful performance objectives, tracking or reporting, and have failed to approach claims handling with consumers front of mind.�
To understand the range of practices across industry, obÌåÓý's review included retail, industry and public sector trustees, with both insourced and outsourced administration models. obÌåÓý also included trustees that were likely to have both good and poor practices, based on the intelligence available to us.
Ms Constant said that there was huge variation in claims handling times across trustees reviewed by obÌåÓý and that trustees had a lot of control over how quickly they got things done.
‘The fastest trustee closed approximately 48% of death benefit claims in 90 days whereas the slowest trustee closed only around 8% of claims in the same period of time,� Ms Constant said.
Of the claim files obÌåÓý reviewed, 78% had delays caused by processing issues within the trustee’s control.
Ms Constant also called out instances of poor customer service in 27% of those claim files. There were examples where claimants phone calls were not returned, their queries were dismissed, or claimants were asked for unreasonable information.
‘Many of the complaints we read were distressing. We saw deep grief, vulnerability, frustration and genuine suffering,� she said.
In one case, a trustee took over 500 days to pay a death benefit of around $100,000 to a First Nations woman who was grieving the loss of her husband. The trustee failed to respond to her concerns about financial hardship and did not support her when she struggled to understand and navigate the claims process.
‘The money from a death benefit can make a huge difference and each day a trustee delays that payment causes real harm to families. Trustees need to do better,� Ms Constant said.
Following the release of this report, Ms Constant said obÌåÓý will review the progress all trustees have made on improving their death benefit claims handling processes to ensure that they are appropriately prioritising the needs of members and their beneficiaries.
Infographic - What obÌåÓý’s review into death benefit claims handling revealed about super trustees (text version)
- 0 trustees monitored or reported on end-to-end death benefit claims handling times
- 27% of claims files reviewed involved poor customer service - e.g. calls were not returned, queries were dismissed
- 8% vs 48% was the difference in claims closed in 90 days between the slowest and the fastest trustee
- Members living in First Nations postcodes generally experienced greater delays than other members
- 78% of claim files reviewed were delayed by processing issues within the trustee's control
- 17% of claim files reviewed had claimants who were experiencing vulnerability - about 30% of those were handled poorly
- Claims with binding nominations were processed faster than claims with non-binding nominations or no nomination
Background
Report 806 Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve provides detailed observations from obÌåÓý’s review of death benefit claims handling practices of 10 trustees over a two-year period ending 31 March 2024. These trustees represent 38% of all member benefits in superannuation funds regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
obÌåÓý reviewed:
- Australian Retirement Trust
- Avanteos (Colonial First State)
- Brighter Super
- Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation
- HESTA
- Hostplus
- NM Super (AMP)
- Nulis (MLC)
- Rest
- UniSuper
To prioritise taking action against misconduct, any trustee that was being considered for enforcement investigation was excluded from the final phase of the review.
Earlier this month, obÌåÓý launched civil penalty proceedings against AustralianSuper over alleged delayed processing of nearly 7,000 death benefit claims (25-034MR).
In November last year, obÌåÓý also filed civil penalty proceedings against United Super Pty Ltd, the trustee of Cbus after alleging more than 10,000 members and claimants were impacted by death benefits and total and permanent disability insurance claims taking more than 90 days to be processed (24-251MR).
Report 806 Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve is part of obÌåÓý’s member services project, examining industry practices and compliance with laws relating to trustee administration and contact centres. Improving services to superannuation fund members and acting against member services failures are strategic priorities for obÌåÓý.
Download
- Report 806 Taking ownership of death benefits: How trustees can deliver outcomes Australians deserve
More information
- obÌåÓý sues AustralianSuper alleging significant death benefit claims failures (25-034MR) - 12 March 2025
- obÌåÓý writes to superannuation trustees to drive improvement to death benefit claims handling - 20 November 2024
- obÌåÓý sues Cbus alleging systemic claims handling failures (24-251MR) - 12 November 2024
- Improving superannuation member services � Dealing with death benefit claims - 1 May 2024